首页> 外文OA文献 >Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review
【2h】

Acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for the treatment of chronic pain: a meta-analytic review

机译:基于接受度和正念度的慢性疼痛干预措施:荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The number of acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions for chronic pain, such as acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT), mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR), and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), increased in recent years. Therefore an update is warranted of our former systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that reported effects on the mental and physical health of chronic pain patients. Pubmed, EMBASE, PsycInfo and Cochrane were searched for eligible studies. Current meta-analysis only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Studies were rated for quality. Mean quality did not improve in recent years. Pooled standardized mean differences using the random-effect model were calculated to represent the average intervention effect and, to perform subgroup analyses. Outcome measures were pain intensity, depression, anxiety, pain interference, disability and quality of life. Included were twenty-five RCTs totaling 1285 patients with chronic pain, in which we compared acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions to the waitlist, (medical) treatment-as-usual, and education or support control groups. Effect sizes ranged from small (on all outcome measures except anxiety and pain interference) to moderate (on anxiety and pain interference) at post-treatment and from small (on pain intensity and disability) to large (on pain interference) at follow-up. ACT showed significantly higher effects on depression and anxiety than MBSR and MBCT. Studies’ quality, attrition rate, type of pain and control group, did not moderate the effects of acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions. Current acceptance- and mindfulness-based interventions, while not superior to traditional cognitive behavioral treatments, can be good alternatives.
机译:近年来,基于接受和正念的慢性疼痛干预措施的数量有所增加,例如接受和承诺疗法(ACT),基于正念的压力减轻(MBSR)和基于正念的认知疗法(MBCT)。因此,有必要对我们以前的系统综述和荟萃分析进行更新,这些研究报道了对慢性疼痛患者心理和身体健康的影响。搜索Pubmed,EMBASE,PsycInfo和Cochrane以寻找符合条件的研究。当前的荟萃分析仅包括随机对照试验(RCT)。研究被评定为质量。近年来平均质量没有改善。使用随机效应模型计算合并的标准化均值差异,以代表平均干预效果并进行亚组分析。结果指标为疼痛强度,抑郁,焦虑,疼痛干扰,残疾和生活质量。包括25项RCT,共1285例慢性疼痛患者,我们将基于接受和正念的干预措施与候补名单,(常规)(医学)治疗以及教育或支持对照组进行了比较。疗效大小从治疗后的小(对焦虑和疼痛干扰除外的所有结果)到中等(对焦虑和疼痛干扰的干预),在随访时从小(对疼痛强度和残疾)到大(对疼痛干扰) 。与MBSR和MBCT相比,ACT对抑郁和焦虑的影响显着更高。研究的质量,耗损率,疼痛类型和对照组没有减轻基于接受和正念的干预措施的影响。当前的基于接受和正念的干预措施虽然不能优于传统的认知行为治疗方法,但却是不错的选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号